Thread:NoBanana/@comment-25178962-20140714225945/@comment-24108228-20140715224050

Gosh, you've found threads like that? Wow, you live up to your name alright. Reminds me of me.

For your bomb statement, I would like to remind you that bombs do absolutely nothing. Even if (which I do hope they do) they get buffed, the remarkable rise in cost from: A Tree and a Couple Small Leaves To: Masses of coal, Sulphur, Chemistry and engineering, along with many other end game skill levels, and a one time use. Does remove any way that this could be a usable material for large scale raiding. Plus, few people actually do it. Of all the farmlands I have seen burnt, only one person dragged the burning bricks away from their land, the rest either forage, had fireproofed, put out the fire, or just let the farmland burn while they chase the pyromaniac with high level weaponry.

If we were to disallow it (which I have never suggested, simply stated minor disapproval for the concept of that defence mechanism), it wouldn't really affect anyone. Other than bigmanpoo (the guy who was in possession of that castle), nobody would even notice a change. It does seem to me like you are trying to make a big deal of nothing, having taken a quote from an old story I wrote, done a butload of research into the past history of my opinions, enlarged my stance (I was never adamant, implying it should be against the rules, or anything like that), and continued to argue despite me giving an answer to your question.

If anything, I respect your dedication, but this really isn't a large topic. I have no strong feelings either way, and I doubt it would affect anyone largely if this was changed. Can we let this drop?