Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-24108228-20140529230656/@comment-24542952-20140605191027

FredeyFly wrote: @Min How is this going off topic?

Also, I am pretty sure the community has decided, 17 say yes to 3 say no. One of those people who say no doesn't have a good reason either. Here:

Michael20028 wrote: Yea right, I have some stuff to point out. But then again I'm not contributing in this conversation again in a positive way. But I'll point one real small-needed point.

NoBanana, what you just said in here counters what you said above. You said above that if someone says "No" they have to say why. And everyone who voted "No" said why they voted "No" on the poll. And now you say that people are lazy and a poll is supposed to be an easy way of communicating your opinion?! What the #@^$?! I swear I'm confused now. If what you just said now really counters your post, then we didn't need to specify the reason why we said "No", if the people who said "Yes" won't specify it too?! What is the damned point in what you said? That doesn't make sense. Again, if what you said is true. Then I didn't need to post a text wall and specify why I said "No" in the first place.

Edit: Add what I'm going to say now to my point above. NoBanana, you said that people might make alternate accounts on the Wiki just to post "No". And you wanted the people who voted no to specify why they voted "No". Okay so, many people can make alternate accounts to support this idea. The concept is, if someone wants something, they will probably keep trying to get it on. If someone doesn't want it, they will specify it and leave. Now my point is that why can't people make alternate accounts with other IP's to bypass the poll and vote again?! You told us to specify why we said "No", then you have to tell the people who said "Yes" to specify it. This is not making any bit of sense, you just countered what you said and I didn't need to write a text wall in the >first place<.